Morrow v. Genovese
| James E. Morrow |
| Kevin Genovese |
| 2:2022cv02125 |
| February 28, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| Mark S Norris |
| Tu M Pham |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER GRANTING #13 RESPONDENT'S SECOND MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME. Signed by Judge Mark S. Norris on 04/28/2022. (Norris, Mark)
|
|
Filing 13
Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply TO HABEAS CORPUS PETITION - PROPOSED ORDER SUBMITTED by Kevin Genovese. (Barker, Zachary)
|
|
Filing 12
PRO SE AMENDED COMPLAINT /PETITION FOR HABEAS CORPUS against Kevin Genovese, filed by James E. Morrow. (Attachments: #1 envelope)(jae)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER DENYING #10 WITHOUT PREJUDICE PETITIONER'S REQUEST TO ADD AN EXHAUSTED CLAIM. Signed by Judge Mark S. Norris on 04/08/2022. (Norris, Mark)
|
|
Filing 10
PRO SE MOTION to add an exhausted claim to pending habeas petition by James E. Morrow. (Attachments: #1 envelope)(jae)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENTS MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME; ORDER FINDING AS MOOT PETITIONER'S PRO SE MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME. Signed by Judge Mark S. Norris on 03/28/2022.(Norris, Mark)
|
|
Filing 8
First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer proposed order submitted by Kevin Genovese. (Barker, Zachary)
|
|
Filing 7
PRO SE MOTION to Extend Deadline to file brief by James E. Morrow. (Attachments: #1 envelope)(jae)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE of Appearance by Zachary Lewis Barker on behalf of Kevin Genovese (Barker, Zachary)
|
|
Filing 5
Domestic Return Receipts of certified mail to Warden Kevin Genovese and US AG (Attachments: #1 Ret Receipt - US AG)(jae)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER DIRECTING RESPONDENT TO FILE RECORD AND RESPOND TO THE PETITION. Signed by Judge Mark S. Norris on 03/01/2022. (Norris, Mark)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Pro Se Prisoner track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (csf)
|
|
Filing 2
Case initiation fee: PAID $ 5.00, receipt number M4676051477 (csf)
|
|
Filing 1
PRO SE Petition Under 28 U.S.C. 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by James E. Morrow against Kevin Genovese. (Attachments: #1 Attachments, #2 CCA Appeal, #3 Supreme Court of TN Mandate, #4 Cover Letter, #5 Envelope, #6 Judicial Cards)(csf)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Morrow v. Genovese | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: James E. Morrow | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Kevin Genovese | |
| Represented By: | Zachary Lewis Barker |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
