Myrtil v. Serra Chevrolet
Plaintiff: Jean Myrtil
Defendant: Serra Chevrolet
Case Number: 2:2022cv02595
Filed: September 9, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee
Presiding Judge: Mark S Norris
Referring Judge: Tu M Pham
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 16 SCHEDULING ORDER. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Tu M. Pham on November 8, 2022. (cmp)
November 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 15 Plaintiff's RESPONSE to Defendant's Motion re #9 Motion to Dismiss (For Failure to State a Claim) ) filed by Jean Myrtil. (Attachments: #1 Application to Proceed without Prepayment)(csf)
October 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Chief Magistrate Judge Tu M. Pham: Scheduling Conference held on 10/27/2022. Pro Se Plaintiff, Jean Myrtil, present in the courtroom. Gregory Grisham appearing for the Defendant. Court went over proposed dates with parties. Plaintiff given IFP form by courtroom clerk to qualify for Court appointed mediator. Plaintiff to submit for consideration. Court to enter scheduling order. (Tape #FTR/CR6) (tlh)
October 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 SETTING LETTER: Scheduling Conference set for Thursday, 10/27/2022 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 6 - Memphis before Chief Magistrate Judge Tu M. Pham. (tlh)
October 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Serra Chevrolet identifying Corporate Parent Serra Automotive Inc for Serra Chevrolet.. (Grisham, J.)
October 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Marilyn Lashea Higdon on behalf of Serra Chevrolet (Higdon, Marilyn)
October 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ANSWER to Complaint by Serra Chevrolet.(Grisham, J.)
October 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Serra Chevrolet. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum, #2 Exhibit)(Grisham, J.)
September 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jean Myrtil as to Serra Chevrolet. (agj)
September 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Serra Chevrolet. The Plaintiff was given copies of the issued summons and instructed to serve the Defendant with the summons and complaint. (btg)
September 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Case initiation fee: $ 402, receipt number M4676052909. (btg)
September 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Agreement to Receive Notice of Electronic Filing by Jean Myrtil. (btg)
September 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE OF RIGHT TO CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF CIVIL JURISDICTION BY A MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed.R.Civ.P.73, and Local Rule 72.1, this Court has designated the Magistrate Judges of this District to conduct trials and otherwise dispose of any civil case that is filed in this Court. Your decision to consent, or not consent, to the referral of your case to a United States Magistrate Judge for trial and entry of a final judgment must be entirely voluntary. The judge or magistrate judge to whom the case has been assigned will not be informed of your decision unless all parties agree that the case may be referred to a magistrate judge for these specific purposes. A less than unanimous decision will not be communicated by this office to either the judge or magistrate judge. The consent form is available on the courts website at https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/forms-and-applications.php (btg)
September 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE TO COMPLY WITH PLAN FOR ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR): Pursuant to Section to 2.1 of the ADR Plan, all civil cases filed on or after Sept. 1, 2014, shall be referred automatically for ADR. For compliance requirements, refer to the ADR Plan at: http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/ADRPlan.pdf (btg)
September 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Standard track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (btg)
September 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT against Serra Chevrolet, filed by Jean Myrtil. (Attachments: #1 Right to Sue Letter)(btg) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/9/2022: #2 Judicial Cards) (btg).
September 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Pursuant to Administrative Order 2013-05, this case has been assigned to the United States magistrate judge for management of all pretrial matters. Pursuant to Local Rule 4.1(b)(1), the plaintiff shall present the Clerk with a properly completed summons for each defendant, and the Clerk shall issue the summons(es) to the plaintiff for service on the defendant(s). (csf)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Myrtil v. Serra Chevrolet
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jean Myrtil
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Serra Chevrolet
Represented By: J. Gregory Grisham
Represented By: Marilyn Lashea Higdon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?