Fernald v. JFE Franchising, Inc.
| Jonathan Fernald |
| JFE Franchising, Inc. doing business as Snowfox |
| Jamita Swearengen |
| 2:2022cv02761 |
| November 3, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| Charmiane G Claxton |
| John Thomas Fowlkes |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER granting #11 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. Responses due by 1/30/2023. Signed by Judge John Thomas Fowlkes, Jr on December 15, 2022. (Fowlkes, J.)
|
|
Filing 11
MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply proposed order submitted by Jonathan Fernald. (Sheng, Elaine)
|
|
Filing 10
MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by JFE Franchising, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support of JFE Franchising, Inc. D/B/A Snowfoxs Motion to Dismiss)(Caraway, Kirk)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. Response to the Complaint due by 12/19/2022. Signed by Judge John Thomas Fowlkes, Jr on November 14, 2022. (Fowlkes, J.)
|
|
Filing 8
SETTING LETTER: Scheduling/Status Conference set for Tuesday, 2/21/2023 09:30 AM before Judge John Thomas Fowlkes Jr. The proceeding will be held via Microsoft Teams video conference. The Court will email the parties an invitation for the video conference 1 day prior to the proceeding.Counsel should submit any exhibits to be offered to the Judge's ECF mailbox prior to the proceeding.The public may also access the video proceeding. If the public and/or media wish to attend in the video proceeding, please click on the following link to request access information: #https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/videohearings The access information will be delivered via email to the email address from which the request originated.Parties should consult the instructions for #Joining a Meeting in Teams or #Joining a Meeting Without a Teams Account. Please email Ross Herrin at ross_herrin@tnwd.uscourts.gov for any questions. Associated Cases: 2:22-cv-02556-JTF-cgc, 2:22-cv-02731-JTF-cgc, 2:22-cv-02752-JTF-tmp, 2:22-cv-02761-JTF-cgc(wrh)
|
|
Filing 7
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge John Thomas Fowlkes, Jr.: Scheduling Conference held on 11/9/2022. Both Parties present via Microsoft Teams video conferencing. The Court stated that de# 22 Motion to Stay is pending. The Court inquired as to the potential of additional lawsuits being filed. Counsel for Plaintiff, John P. Wade informed the Court there is a potential case very similar to the present filings and requests additional time. Counsel for Defense stated 4 cases have been removed to Federal Court. Judge Fowlkes was assigned the 4th (2:22-cv-02761) case last week. There may be other cases filed in the future; cannot be certain, hence, the Motion to Stay. The Court Grants de# 22 Motion to Stay, order to be entered and will hold-off on entering a Scheduling Order. Case set Tuesday, 02/21/2023 at 9:30 a.m. for Status Conference. (Plaintiff: John P. Wade)(Defense: Karen Lott Glover, Mary Wu Tullis, Zachery T. Fardon, Kirk A. Caraway) (Court Reporter Lashawn Marshall.) Associated Cases: 2:22-cv-02556-JTF-cgc, 2:22-cv-02731-JTF-cgc, 2:22-cv-02752-JTF-tmp, 2:22-cv-02761-JTF-cgc(wrh) Modified on 11/9/2022 (wrh).
|
|
Filing 6
MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Complaint and Incorporated Memorandum in Support (proposed Order submitted) by JFE Franchising, Inc.. (Caraway, Kirk)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE OF RIGHT TO CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF CIVIL JURISDICTION BY A MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed.R.Civ.P.73, and Local Rule 72.1, this Court has designated the Magistrate Judges of this District to conduct trials and otherwise dispose of any civil case that is filed in this Court. Your decision to consent, or not consent, to the referral of your case to a United States Magistrate Judge for trial and entry of a final judgment must be entirely voluntary. The judge or magistrate judge to whom the case has been assigned will not be informed of your decision unless all parties agree that the case may be referred to a magistrate judge for these specific purposes. A less than unanimous decision will not be communicated by this office to either the judge or magistrate judge. The consent form is available on the courts website at https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/forms-and-applications.php (jae)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE TO COMPLY WITH PLAN FOR ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR): Pursuant to Section to 2.1 of the ADR Plan, all civil cases filed on or after Sept. 1, 2014, shall be referred automatically for ADR. For compliance requirements, refer to the ADR Plan at: http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/ADRPlan.pdf (jae)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Standard track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (jae)
|
|
Filing 2
Judge John Thomas Fowlkes, Jr and Magistrate Judge Charmiane G. Claxton added. (jae)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL by JFE Franchising, Inc. d/b/a Snowfox from Circuit Court of Shelby County, Tennessee, case number CT-3919-22 (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATNWDC-4006974), filed by JFE Franchising, Inc. d/b/a Snowfox. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-c to Defendant JFE Franchising, Inc. dba Snowfox's Notice of Removal, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Civil Cover Sheet Attachment to Civil Cover Sheet)(Caraway, Kirk)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
