Williams v. Livingston
Petitioner: Clifton Lamar Williams
Respondent: Brad Livingston
Case Number: 1:2009cv00271
Filed: March 30, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Office: Death Penalty - Habeas Corpus Office
County: Smith
Presiding Judge: Ron Clark
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:2254ex Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Capital)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 26, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 31 MEMORANDUM OPINION denying the petition for writ of habeas corpus by Clifton Lamar Williams. Signed by Judge Ron Clark on 3/26/13. cc: 5th Circuit 3/27/13(tkd, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Williams v. Livingston
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Clifton Lamar Williams
Represented By: Jeff Lynn Haas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Brad Livingston
Represented By: Edward Larry Marshall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?