Personal Audio, LLC v. Apple Inc.
Personal Audio, LLC |
Apple Inc. |
1:2011cv00531 |
October 14, 2011 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
Beaumont Office |
Anderson |
Ron Clark |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2011. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Personal Audio, LLC (Goehringer, Charles) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,509,178 against Apple Inc. ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 0540-3274565.), filed by Personal Audio, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Goehringer, Charles) |
In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice of Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (aam, ) |
Case Assigned to Judge Thad Heartfield. (aam, ) |
Case Reassigned to Judge Ron Clark. Judge Thad Heartfield no longer assigned to the case. Pursuant to General Order 11-13 100 percent of Beaumont Patent cases are assigned to Judge Ron Clark. (aam, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.