Fanning v. Director TDCJ-CID
Alan Jay Fanning |
Director, TDCJ-CID |
1:2018cv00367 |
July 19, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
Beaumont Office |
Red River |
Caroline Craven |
Marcia A Crone |
Rodney Gilstrap |
Zack Hawthorn |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 29, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 RESPONSE to #5 Order to Submit Printout of Deposits, by Alan Jay Fanning. (mrp, ) |
Filing 6 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT by Alan Jay Fanning on 8/15/18 of #5 Order to Submit Printout of Deposits. (mrp, ) |
Filing 5 PRELIMINARY FILING FEE ORDER. It is ordered that Pla submit within 20 days either the $400 filing fee or an application to proceed in forma pauperis with a printout from TDCJ showing deposits made to his prisoner account during the preceding 6-month period. Signed by Magistrate Judge Zack Hawthorn on 8/8/18. (mrp, ) |
Case Assigned to District Judge Marcia A. Crone. (aam, ) |
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Zack Hawthorn pursuant to GO 05-10 (aam, ) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Alan Jay Fanning. (mrp, ) |
Filing 3 ORDER OF TRANSFER that Clerk shall TRANSFER this action to the Clerk of US District Court, Eastern District of Texas, Beaumont Division. Signed by Magistrate Judge Caroline Craven on 7/26/2018. (sm, ) |
Filing 2 MEMORANDUM OPINION REGARDING VENUE.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Caroline Craven on 7/26/2018. (sm, ) |
Filing fee received: $ 5.00, receipt number 6-42818. (mjc, ) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $5.00 received.), filed by Alan Jay Fanning. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Official Notice from Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, #5 Envelope(s))(lfs, ) |
STANDING ORDER REFERRING PRISONER CASE to Magistrate Judge Magistrate Judge Caroline Craven for pretrial purposes only.. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 07/19/18. (lfs, ) |
Sent prose guidelines, including change of address information, to the petitioner per Magistrate Judge. (lfs, ) |
In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (lfs, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Fanning v. Director TDCJ-CID | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Director, TDCJ-CID | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Alan Jay Fanning | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.