Golden Hour Data Systems, Inc. v. emsCharts, Inc. et al
2:2006cv00381 |
September 19, 2006 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
Marshall Office |
T. John Ward |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 386 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION - the Court finds emsCharts has not demonstrated by clear and convincing evidence that the applicants of the 073 patent or their prosecution counsel engaged in inequitable conduct during the prosecution of the 073 patent. Accordingly, the 073 patent is not rendered unenforceable on this ground, and judgment shall be entered in favor of Golden Hour, and against emsCharts on the issue of inequitable conduct. Signed by Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 8/15/12. (ehs, ) |
Filing 284 MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - Having found that the threshold levels of materiality and intent are satisfied, the court balances the high level of materiality with evidence of deceptive intent and concludes that Golden Hour committed inequitable conduct. The court therefore concludes that the 073 patent is unenforceable. Signed by Judge T. John Ward on 3/23/09. (ehs, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Golden Hour Data Systems, Inc. v. emsCharts, Inc. et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.