Green v. Blitz U.S.A., Inc. et al
| Rene Green |
| Blitz U.S.A., Inc. and Crestwood Holdings, Inc. |
| 2:2007cv00372 |
| August 28, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Marshall Office |
| Bowie |
| T. John Ward |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
257
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - Court DENIES Plaintiffs Motion to Re-Open the Case (Dkt. No. 199), DENIES Blitzs Motion for Reconsideration. (Dkt. No. 244) AND GRANTS-IN-PART and DENIES-IN-PART Plaintiffs Motion for Sanctions. (Dkt. No. 195.) The Cour t holds that Blitz is subject to sanctions for arious discovery violations as described below in this Memorandum Opinion & Order. Blitz to pay $250,000.00 in civil contempt sanctions to the plaintiff in this case. Blitz has thirty (30) days fro m the date of this Memorandum Opinion & Order to furnish a copy of this Memorandum Opinion & Order to every Plaintiff in every lawsuit it has had proceeding against it, or is currently proceeding against it, for the past two years. The Court issues an additional $500,000.00 sanction that will be tolled for thirty (30) days from the date of this Memorandum Opinion & Order. Signed by Judge T. John Ward on 3/1/11. (ehs, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
