Rembrandt Vision Technologies L P v. Johnson & Johnson Vision Care Inc

Justia Dockets & Filings Fifth Circuit Texas Eastern District Rembrandt Vision Technologies L P v. Johnson & Johnson Vision Care Inc

Rembrandt Vision Technologies L P v. Johnson & Johnson Vision Care Inc

Plaintiff:	Rembrandt Vision Technologies L P
Defendant:	Johnson & Johnson Vision Care Inc
Case Number:	2:2009cv00200
Filed:	June 22, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Office:	Marshall Office
County:	Harrison
Presiding Judge:	T. John Ward
Presiding Judge:
Nature of Suit:	Plaintiff
Cause of Action:	35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 19, 2011	Filing 85 MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - granting JJVC's motion to transfer venue to the USDC of the Middle District of Florida. Signed by Judge T. John Ward on 7/19/11. (ehs, )
April 28, 2011	Filing 67 MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - The Court adopts the constructions set forth in this opinion for the disputed terms of the 327 Patent. The parties are ordered that they may not refer, directly or indirectly, to each others claim construction positions in the presence of the jury. Likewise, the parties are ordered to refrain from mentioning any portion of this opinion, other than the actual definitions adopted by the Court, in the presence of the jury. Any reference to claim construction proceedings is limited to informing the jury of the definitions adopted by the Court.. Signed by Judge T. John Ward on 4/18/11. (ehs, )

Date Filed

Document Text

July 19, 2011

Filing 85 MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - granting JJVC's motion to transfer venue to the USDC of the Middle District of Florida. Signed by Judge T. John Ward on 7/19/11. (ehs, )

April 28, 2011

Filing 67 MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - The Court adopts the constructions set forth in this opinion for the disputed terms of the 327 Patent. The parties are ordered that they may not refer, directly or indirectly, to each others claim construction positions in the presence of the jury. Likewise, the parties are ordered to refrain from mentioning any portion of this opinion, other than the actual definitions adopted by the Court, in the presence of the jury. Any reference to claim construction proceedings is limited to informing the jury of the definitions adopted by the Court.. Signed by Judge T. John Ward on 4/18/11. (ehs, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rembrandt Vision Technologies L P v. Johnson & Johnson Vision Care Inc
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rembrandt Vision Technologies L P
Represented By:	Charles W Goehringer, Jr
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Johnson & Johnson Vision Care Inc
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?