Plant Equipment Inc. v. Intrado Inc.

Justia Dockets & Filings Fifth Circuit Texas Eastern District Plant Equipment Inc. v. Intrado Inc.

Plant Equipment Inc. v. Intrado Inc.

Plaintiff:	Plant Equipment Inc.
Defendant:	Intrado Inc.
Case Number:	2:2009cv00395
Filed:	December 22, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Office:	Marshall Office
County:	Anderson
Presiding Judge:	T. John Ward
Nature of Suit:	Patent
Cause of Action:	15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By:	Both

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
April 27, 2012	Filing 127 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - Plant Claim Construction Order. The Court adopts the constructions set forth in this opinion for the disputed terms of the patent-in-suit. The parties are ordered that they may not refer, directly or indirectly, to eac h others claim construction positions in the presence of the jury. Likewise, the parties are ordered to refrain from mentioning any portion of this opinion, other than the actual definitions adopted by the Court, in the presence of the jury. Any reference to claim construction proceedings is limited to informing the jury of the definitions adopted by the Court.. Signed by Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 4/27/12. (ehs, )
June 16, 2010	Filing 31 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - pending before the court is Dft Intrado Inc Motion to Transfer. The court is of the opinion that the motion should be DENIED. Signed by Judge T. John Ward on 6/15/2010. (ch, )

Date Filed

Document Text

April 27, 2012

Filing 127 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - Plant Claim Construction Order. The Court adopts the constructions set forth in this opinion for the disputed terms of the patent-in-suit. The parties are ordered that they may not refer, directly or indirectly, to eac h others claim construction positions in the presence of the jury. Likewise, the parties are ordered to refrain from mentioning any portion of this opinion, other than the actual definitions adopted by the Court, in the presence of the jury. Any reference to claim construction proceedings is limited to informing the jury of the definitions adopted by the Court.. Signed by Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 4/27/12. (ehs, )

June 16, 2010

Filing 31 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - pending before the court is Dft Intrado Inc Motion to Transfer. The court is of the opinion that the motion should be DENIED. Signed by Judge T. John Ward on 6/15/2010. (ch, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Plant Equipment Inc. v. Intrado Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Plant Equipment Inc.
Represented By:	Michael Scott Dowler
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Intrado Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?