Barker et al v. Chrysler Group, L.L.C

Defendant: Chrysler Group, L.L.C
Plaintiff: Christopher R Barker and Kachia D Barker
Case Number: 2:2012cv00755
Filed: December 4, 2012
Court: Texas Eastern District Court
Office: Marshall Office
County: Henderson
Presiding Judge: Rodney Gilstrap
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28:1391 Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Barker et al v. Chrysler Group, L.L.C
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chrysler Group, L.L.C
Represented By: Roy Anthony Spezia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christopher R Barker
Represented By: Joe Montgomery Worthington
Represented By: Jimmy Michael Negem
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kachia D Barker
Represented By: Jimmy Michael Negem
Represented By: Joe Montgomery Worthington
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.