Vantage Point Technology, Inc. v. Apple Inc. Featured Case
Plaintiff: Vantage Point Technology, Inc.
Defendant: Apple Inc.
Case Number: 2:2013cv00989
Filed: November 21, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Office: Marshall Office
County: Smith
Presiding Judge: Rodney Gilstrap
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 30, 2014. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 1, 2014 Filing 23 REPLY to Response to Motion re 18 Opposed MOTION to Change Venue filed by Apple Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit B)(Rueckheim, Michael)
April 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER granting 21 Motion to File Inadvertenly Omitted Declaration. Signed by Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 4/24/14. (bas, )
April 23, 2014 Filing 21 Unopposed MOTION File Inadvertently Omitted Declaration In Support Of Apples Motion To Transfer Venue re 18 Opposed MOTION to Change Venue by Apple Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - Buckley Decl, # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(Rueckheim, Michael)
April 23, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Mediator Hon. David Folsom, Jackson Walker, L.L.P., 6004 Summerfield Drive, Texarkana, Texas 75503, telephone number 903-255-3251, fax number 903- 255-3266, and email dfolsom@jw.com, is hereby appointed as mediator. Signed by Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 4/22/2014. (ch, )
April 21, 2014 Filing 19 RESPONSE to Motion re 18 Opposed MOTION to Change Venue filed by Vantage Point Technology, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Storm, Paul)
April 4, 2014 Filing 18 Opposed MOTION to Change Venue by Apple Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit B, # 4 Exhibit C, # 5 Exhibit D, # 6 Exhibit E, # 7 Exhibit F, # 8 Exhibit G, # 9 Exhibit H, # 10 Text of Proposed Order)(Rueckheim, Michael)
March 20, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER OF CONSOLIDATION; The above-captioned cases are hereby ORDERED to be CONSOLIDATED for all pretrial issues (except venue) with the LEAD CASE, Cause No. 2:13-cv-909. All parties are instructed to file any future filings (except relating to venue) in the LEAD CASE. Signed by Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 3/19/14. (mrm, )
March 20, 2014 Filing 16 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Michael Robert Rueckheim on behalf of Apple Inc. (Rueckheim, Michael)
February 21, 2014 Filing 15 ANSWER TO COUNTERCLAIMS ANSWER to 9 Answer to Complaint, Counterclaim by Vantage Point Technology, Inc..(Storm, Paul)
February 4, 2014 Filing 14 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance - Pro Hac Vice by Katherine Kelly Lutton on behalf of Apple Inc.. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number 0540-4508552. (Lutton, Katherine)
February 4, 2014 Filing 13 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Betty Hong Chen on behalf of Apple Inc. (Chen, Betty)
February 4, 2014 Filing 12 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Benjamin Charles Elacqua on behalf of Apple Inc. (Elacqua, Benjamin)
February 4, 2014 Filing 11 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by John Philip Brinkmann on behalf of Apple Inc. (Brinkmann, John)
February 4, 2014 In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice of Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (ch, )
January 31, 2014 Filing 10 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Apple Inc. (Brinkmann, John)
January 31, 2014 Filing 9 Apple, Inc.'s ANSWER to 1 Complaint Affirmative Defenses, COUNTERCLAIM against Vantage Point Technology, Inc. by Apple Inc..(Brinkmann, John)
January 15, 2014 Filing 8 Defendant's Unopposed Second Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Apple Inc..( Brinkmann, John)
January 15, 2014 Defendant's Unopposed Second Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is GRANTED pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Apple Inc. to 1/31/2014. 15 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( sm, )
December 16, 2013 Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Vantage Point Technology, Inc.. Apple Inc. served on 11/26/2013, answer due 12/17/2013. (bas, )
December 16, 2013 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is GRANTED pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Apple Inc. to 1/16/2014. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( sm, )
December 13, 2013 Filing 6 Defendant's Unopposed FIRST Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Apple Inc..( Brinkmann, John)
November 22, 2013 Filing 5 SUMMONS Issued as to Apple Inc.. (ch, )
November 21, 2013 Filing 4 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Sarah Marie Paxson on behalf of Vantage Point Technology, Inc. (Paxson, Sarah)
November 21, 2013 Filing 3 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Storm, Paul)
November 21, 2013 Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Vantage Point Technology, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Marathon Patent Group, Inc. for Vantage Point Technology, Inc.. (Storm, Paul)
November 21, 2013 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Apple Inc. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0540-4414171.), filed by Vantage Point Technology, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Storm, Paul)
November 21, 2013 In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice of Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (ch, )
November 21, 2013 Case assigned to Judge Rodney Gilstrap. (ch, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Vantage Point Technology, Inc. v. Apple Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Vantage Point Technology, Inc.
Represented By: Sarah Marie Paxson
Represented By: Paul V Storm
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Apple Inc.
Represented By: John Philip Brinkmann
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?