SyncPoint Imaging, LLC v. Nintendo of America Inc. et al
| SyncPoint Imaging, LLC |
| Nintendo of America Inc., Nintendo Co., Ltd., Game X Change, Inc., Games2Go and PixArt Imaging, Inc. |
| 2:2015cv00247 |
| February 20, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Marshall Office |
| Anderson |
| Rodney Gilstrap |
| Roy S. Payne |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
370
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 12/26/2018. (klc, )
|
|
Filing
362
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 290 SEALED MOTION for Exception Case Attorneys Fees Under 35 U.S.C. 285 filed by Nintendo of America Inc., Nintendo Co., Ltd., 291 SEALED MOTION for Determination of No Privilege filed by Nintendo of America Inc., Nintendo Co., Ltd., 358 MOTION for Joinder of Karl Hansen and the Pia Firm as Parties filed by Nintendo of America Inc., Nintendo Co., Ltd.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 7/9/2018. (nkl, )
|
|
Filing
283
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 279 , OVERRULED 282 Objections to Report and Recommendation Denying 260 Motion to Dismiss without prejudice. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 2/9/2018. This case is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. (ch, )
|
|
Filing
230
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 1/5/2016. (ch, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
