Rembrandt Wireless Technologies, LP v. Apple Inc.
| Rembrandt Wireless Technologies, LP |
| Apple Inc. |
| 2:2019cv00025 |
| January 24, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Rodney Gilstrap |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 Defendant's Unopposed Second Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Apple Inc..( Smith, Melissa) |
| Defendant's Unopposed SECOND Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Apple Inc. to 3/31/2019. 15 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( ch, ) |
| Filing 15 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Enger, Eric) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Demetrios Anaipakos on behalf of Rembrandt Wireless Technologies, LP (Anaipakos, Demetrios) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Amir H. Alavi on behalf of Rembrandt Wireless Technologies, LP (Alavi, Amir) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Kyril Vladimir Talanov on behalf of Rembrandt Wireless Technologies, LP (Talanov, Kyril) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Alisa Anne Lipski on behalf of Rembrandt Wireless Technologies, LP (Lipski, Alisa) |
| Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Apple Inc. to 3/16/2019. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( slo, ) |
| Filing 10 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Apple Inc..( Smith, Melissa) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Rembrandt Wireless Technologies, LP. Apple Inc. served on 1/24/2019, answer due 2/14/2019. (ch, ) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Andrea Leigh Fair on behalf of Rembrandt Wireless Technologies, LP (Fair, Andrea) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Blaine Andrew Larson on behalf of Rembrandt Wireless Technologies, LP (Larson, Blaine) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Michael F Heim on behalf of Rembrandt Wireless Technologies, LP (Heim, Michael) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Christopher Michael First on behalf of Rembrandt Wireless Technologies, LP (First, Christopher) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Thomas John Ward, Jr on behalf of Rembrandt Wireless Technologies, LP (Ward, Thomas) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Claire Abernathy Henry on behalf of Rembrandt Wireless Technologies, LP (Henry, Claire) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued as to Apple Inc.. (ch, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against Apple Inc. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0540-7108907.), filed by Rembrandt Wireless Technologies, LP. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Enger, Eric) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap. (ch, ) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (ch, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
