MetroPCS v Mynextcellular, LLC
MetroPCS |
Mynextcellular, LLC, Elton Chau and Anuj Shah |
4:2016cv00283 |
May 2, 2016 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
Sherman Office |
Collin |
Ron Clark |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 91 MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE for 87 Report and Recommendations. The Motion for Final Judgment and Permanent Injunction Against Defendant MyNextCellular, LLC (Dkt. 83 ) is GRANTED and the Permanent Injunction Against Defendant MyNextCellular (see Dkt. #83-4) shall be entered. Signed by Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 10/2/2017. (baf, ) |
Filing 88 MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE - the Joint Motion for Final Judgment and Permanent Injunction Against Defendants (Dkt. 85 ) is GRANTED and the Permanent Injunction Against Defendants Chau and Shah (Dkt. #85-1) shall be entered. Signed by Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 9/28/2017. (baf, ) |
Filing 53 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - It is therefore ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Strike and for Entry of Default (Dkt. 35 ) is hereby DENIED. Signed by Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 4/4/2017. (baf, ) |
Filing 28 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER, re 11 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Elton Chau. ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #11) is hereby DENIED. Signed by Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 12/2/2016. (kls, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.