Greenlaw et al v. Klimek et al
4:2020cv00311 |
December 11, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
Sherman Office |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 64 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. It is ORDERED that UDF and the Executives' Motion to Strike Exhibits From Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Complaint, (Dkt. # 30 ), is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Complaint under Rule 12(b)(6), (Dkt. # 25 ), is GRANTED. All claims against Defendants Klimek, Bunch, Edson, and Does 110 are therefore DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by District Judge Sean D. Jordan on 12/27/2021. (daj, ) |
Filing 50 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION. It is Ordered that Plaintiffs' Motion to Redact Complaint, (Dkt. # 17 ), is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Signed by District Judge Sean D. Jordan on 12/11/2020. (las) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Greenlaw et al v. Klimek et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.