Dillenberg v. Watts et al
Case Number: 4:2020cv00458
Filed: March 22, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Office: Sherman Office
Nature of Suit: Racketeer/Corrupt Organization
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 131 MEMORANDUM ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. It is therefore ORDERED that the City-Affiliated Defendants' Motions to Dismiss, (Dkts. #86; #87; #88; #89; #90; #91; #92; #93), and the Denton County Def endants' Motions to Dismiss, (Dkts. #84; #85), are GRANTED, and the City-Affiliated Defendants' Motion to Dismiss under Younger, (Dkt. #102), is DENIED. Plaintiff Stephen Paul Dillenberg's claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, and Plaintiff Stephen Paul Dillenberg's state law claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by District Judge Sean D. Jordan on 7/9/2021. (baf, )
March 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 128 MEMORANDUM ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE for 123 Report and Recommendation. It is therefore ORDERED that Plaintiff Stephen Paul Dillenberg's "Motion for Preliminary Injunctive Relief and Order Granting Removal of Criminal Prosecution," (Dkt. # 51 ), is DENIED. Signed by District Judge Sean D. Jordan on 3/22/2021. (daj, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dillenberg v. Watts et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?