Dillenberg v. Watts et al
4:2020cv00458 |
March 22, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
Sherman Office |
Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 131 MEMORANDUM ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. It is therefore ORDERED that the City-Affiliated Defendants' Motions to Dismiss, (Dkts. #86; #87; #88; #89; #90; #91; #92; #93), and the Denton County Def endants' Motions to Dismiss, (Dkts. #84; #85), are GRANTED, and the City-Affiliated Defendants' Motion to Dismiss under Younger, (Dkt. #102), is DENIED. Plaintiff Stephen Paul Dillenberg's claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, and Plaintiff Stephen Paul Dillenberg's state law claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by District Judge Sean D. Jordan on 7/9/2021. (baf, ) |
Filing 128 MEMORANDUM ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE for 123 Report and Recommendation. It is therefore ORDERED that Plaintiff Stephen Paul Dillenberg's "Motion for Preliminary Injunctive Relief and Order Granting Removal of Criminal Prosecution," (Dkt. # 51 ), is DENIED. Signed by District Judge Sean D. Jordan on 3/22/2021. (daj, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Dillenberg v. Watts et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.