Ovesian v. Denton District Attorney's Office et al
| 4:2021cv00168 |
| May 24, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Sherman Office |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
36
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. It is ORDERED that Plaintiff's claims against the Remaining Defendants are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that all of Plaintiff's claims in this action are DISMISSED. All relief not previously granted is DENIED, and the Clerk is directed to CLOSE this civil action. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 1/20/2023. (baf, )
|
|
Filing
29
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE for 26 Order and Report and Recommendations. It is hereby ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 12 ) and the Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Dkt. 15 ) a re GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint that complies with the federal pleading standards set forth in the Report of the United States Magistrate Judge. The amended complaint, if any, must be filed no later than fourteen (14) days after Plaintiff receives service of this Memorandum. It is further ORDERED that the Motion for a More Definite Statement (Dkt. 14 ) is DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 3/16/2022. (baf, )
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER AND REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE re 21 MOTION to Strike 20 Complaint Fifth Amended filed by Wildridge, 23 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Wildridge.The Court ORDERS that Plaintiff&# 039;s Fifth Amended Complaint (Dkt. 20 ), Wildridge's Answer to the Fifth Amended Complaint (Dkt. 22 ), and Farmers' Answer to the Fifth Amended Complaint (Dkt. 24 ) are STRICKEN, as Plaintiff did not receive prior leave to file the Fi fth Amended Complaint.The Court further ORDERS that Wildridge's Motion to Strike the Fifth Amended Complaint (Dkt. 21 ) and Motion to Dismiss the Fifth Amended Complaint (Dkt. 23 ) are DENIED AS MOOT. The Court recommends the Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 12) and Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Dkt. 15) be GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly C Priest Johnson on 2/16/2022. (baf, )
|
|
Filing
18
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The Court finds Plaintiff's Motion to Appoint Counsel (Dkt. 16 ) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly C Priest Johnson on 5/24/2021. (rpc, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ovesian v. Denton District Attorney's Office et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
