Ross v. Smith et al
| Charles E. Ross |
| Guy Smith, David Langston and John & Jane Does |
| 6:2009cv00268 |
| June 16, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Tyler Office |
| Anderson |
| John D. Love |
| Michael H. Schneider |
| None |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
84
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING 82 Report and Recommendations of the US Magistrate Judge and Entering Final Judgment. Defendant Dr. Jerry Toole's 81 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED, and this civil action is DISMISSED with prejudice. All motions pending in this action are DENIED. Signed by Judge Michael H. Schneider on 2/16/2012. (leh, )
|
|
Filing
78
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING 72 Report and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge and Dismissing Dr. Owen Murray. It is ORDERED that the Defendant's 54 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED, and the claims against the defendant Dr. Owen Murray are DISMISSED from this lawsuit. The dismissal of the claims against Dr. Murray shall have no effect upon the plaintiff's claims against Dr. Jerry Toole. Signed by Judge Michael H. Schneider on 9/13/11. (leh, )
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE for 10 Report and Recommendations, and denying 7 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Charles E. Ross. Signed by Judge Michael H. Schneider on 12/21/2009. (gsg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
