Merrell v. Astrue
Plaintiff: Larry Merrell
Defendant: Michael Astrue
Case Number: 6:2012cv00393
Filed: June 20, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Office: Tyler Office
County: Henderson
Presiding Judge: John D. Love
Presiding Judge: Michael H. Schneider
Nature of Suit: Retirement and Survivors Benefits
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 206
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 1, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 21 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION and ORDER re 3 Complaint filed by Larry Merrell. ORDERED that the decision of the Commissioner is hereby AFFIRMED and this social security action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Magistrate Judge John D. Love on 10/1/2013. (gsg)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Merrell v. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Larry Merrell
Represented By: Jacqueline F Morgan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?