Rapid Completions LLC v. Baker Hughes Incorporated et al
Rapid Completions LLC |
Baker Hughes Incorporated, Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations Inc., Weatherford International plc, Weatherford International, LLC, Weatherford/Lamb, Inc., Peak Completion Technologies, Inc., Pegasi Energy Resources Corporation, Pegasi Operating, Inc. and TR Rodessa, Inc. |
6:2015cv00724 |
July 31, 2015 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
Tyler Office |
Smith |
K. Nicole Mitchell |
Robert W. Schroeder |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 192 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION and ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 122 Opposed SEALED MOTION to Strike Plaintiff's Infringement Contentions filed by Weatherford International, LLC, Weatherford Artificial Lift Systems LLC, Weat herford US, LP, Weatherford/Lamb, Inc., 131 SEALED PATENT MOTION TO COMPEL AMENDED INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS OR, ALTERNATIVELY TO STRIKE RAPID COMPLETIONS'S INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS filed by Pegasi Operating, Inc., Pegasi Energy Resources Corporation, Baker Hughes Incorporated. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell on 6/21/2016. (gsg) |
Filing 173 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION and ORDER re 132 MOTION to Stay filed by Baker Hughes Incorporated, Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations Inc. The Court DENIES-IN-PART the Motion without prejudice and GRANTS Defendants request for alternative relief. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell on 6/1/2016. (gsg) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.