Distefano v. Gorsuch et al
| Frank Distefano |
| Keith Gorsuch, Lorie Davis, Greg Abbott, Ken Paxton, Jr, Raleigh Breeden, G P Harris and William Wheat |
| 6:2020cv00385 |
| July 15, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Jeremy D Kernodle |
| John D Love |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER for Initial Partial Filing Fee of $38.00 within 30 days for Frank Distefano. Signed by Magistrate Judge John D. Love on 8/31/2020. (gsg)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER TO AMEND re #2 Complaint filed by Frank Distefano. ORDERED that the Plaintiff Frank Distefano shall file an amended complaint which complies with this order within 30 days from the date of receipt of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge John D. Love on 8/31/2020. (gsg)
|
| Filing 10 OBJECTION to #7 Report and Recommendations by Frank Distefano. (mll, ) |
| Filing 9 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT by Frank Distefano as to #7 Report and Recommendations. Received 7/30/2020. (ndc) |
| Filing 8 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT by Frank Distefano as to #1 Order. Received 7/24/2020. (ndc) |
| Filing 7 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. It is recommended that the above-styled civil rights lawsuit be dismissed without prejudice based on the plaintiff's declaration that he does not wish to proceed in this case. Should Plaintiff wish to proceed in this individual lawsuit, he may notify the Court within the time for filing objections. Signed by Magistrate Judge John D. Love on 07/17/20. (mll, ) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF OBJECTIONS TO SEVERANCE by Frank Distefano (mll, ) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE Of Declaration in Support by Frank Distefano re #4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (mll, ) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Frank Distefano. (Attachments: #1 TDCJ IFP Inmate Data Sheet, #2 Cover Letter, #3 Envelope(s))(mll, ) |
| Filing 3 CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge John D Love. (mll, ) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Frank Distefano. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits) (SEVERED FROM CIVIL ACTION 6:20CV302)(mll, ) |
|
Filing 1
ORDER OF SEVERANCE. This lawsuit is SEVERED into four individual lawsuits and the Clerk shall ISSUE a separate cause number for three new lawsuits by the severed co-Plaintiffs listed immediately above, with the exception of Clifton B. Hennington. Individual Plaintiff Hennington will be retained in Case Number 6:20cv302, along with any co-plaintiff that has not responded to the Court's order at this time. No motions for appointment of counsel or discovery may be filed until the Court has completed its screening of each individual Plaintiff's lawsuit. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell on 07/15/20. (mll, )
|
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. ***MAILED Consent Form to plaintiff. (mll, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
