Woodruff v The Northern Trust Company
Plaintiff: MYRA JEAN WOODRUFF and BOBBI LOUISE WOODRUFF
Defendant: The Northern Trust Company
Case Number: 6:2020cv00638
Filed: December 10, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Jeremy D Kernodle
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER GRANTING RULE 12(E) MOTION #3 MOTION to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, Motion for More Definite Statement. Status Conference set for 2/26/2021 at 10:00 AM in Ctrm 101 (Tyler) before District Judge Jeremy D. Kernodle . Signed by District Judge Jeremy D. Kernodle on 2/5/2021. (efarris, )
December 23, 2020 Filing 4 RESPONSE to Motion re #3 MOTION to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, Motion for More Definite Statement filed by Bobbi Louise Woodruff, Myra Jean Woodruff. (Phillips, Glenn)
December 17, 2020 Filing 3 MOTION to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, Motion for More Definite Statement by The Northern Trust Company. (Wariner, Sarah)
December 11, 2020 In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (mll, )
December 10, 2020 Filing 2 COMPLAINT against The Northern Trust Company, filed by Myra Jean Woodruff, Bobbi Louise Woodruff. (Filed in state court as "Plaintiff's Original Petition")(mll, )
December 10, 2020 District Judge Jeremy D. Kernodle added. (mll, )
December 10, 2020 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by The Northern Trust Company from 124th District Court of Gregg County, case number 2020-2015-B. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0540-8147571), filed by The Northern Trust Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Wariner, Sarah)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Woodruff v The Northern Trust Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Northern Trust Company
Represented By: Sarah Nichols Wariner
Represented By: Anna Katherine Olin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MYRA JEAN WOODRUFF
Represented By: Glenn Donald Phillips
Represented By: Mary Kathleen Gilchrist Brucia,
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: BOBBI LOUISE WOODRUFF
Represented By: Mary Kathleen Gilchrist Brucia
Represented By: Glenn Donald Phillips
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?