State of Texas, et al v. Alabama-Coushatta, et al
| State of Texas |
| John Cornyn, John Doe and Alabama-Coushatta Tribe of Texas |
| State of Texas |
| Alabama-Coushatta Tribe of Texas, Alabama-Coushatta Tribal Council, Kevin Battise and Joe Bergen |
| Jeff Kaplan |
| 9:2001cv00299 |
| November 21, 2001 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Lufkin Office |
| Polk |
| Keith F. Giblin |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 25 U.S.C. ยง 640 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
193
MEMORANDUM OPINION, FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW ON THE STATE'S MOTION FOR CONTEMPT. The Court therefore DENIES the State's request for the Tribe to show cause and to hold the Tribe in contempt 160 . The Court further DENIES the State's request to enjoin the bingo gaming currently offered on the Tribe's reservation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Keith F. Giblin on 8/31/21. (ljw, )
|
|
Filing
129
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The State of Texas' Amended First Motion for Contempt for Violation of the June 25, 2002, Injunction, and Alternatively for Equitable Declaratory and Injunctive Relief 74 and Motion for Summary Judgment of Con tempt and to Enforce the Court's June 25, 2002, Permanent Injunction 96 are GRANTED IN PART. The Court further ORDERS that the Tribe's Motion for Relief from Judgment 76 and Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 99 are DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Keith F. Giblin on 2/6/18. (ljw, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
