Marquez v. Quarterman et al
Nicolas Marquez |
Nathaniel Quarterman, Timothy Simmons, Unidentified Woody, Unidentified Mimms, Unidentified Holliday, N. Williamson, K. Wallace, Guy Smith and Unidentified Lemaster |
9:2009cv00071 |
April 24, 2009 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
Lufkin Office |
Polk |
Ron Clark |
Judith K. Guthrie |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 83 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION and ORDER OF DISMISSAL re 1 Case Transferred In - District Transfer filed by Nicolas Marquez. ORDERED that the complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice. ORDERED that all motions not previously ruled on are DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Judith K. Guthrie on 3/18/2010. (gsg) |
Filing 43 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. Dr. Woody's motion to dismiss Plaintiff's complaint 39 is denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Judith K. Guthrie on 12/8/09. (ljw, ) Modified on 12/10/2009 (ljw, ). |
Filing 14 MEMORANDUM OPINION and order of partial dismissal dismissing defendant's Timothy Simmons; Guy Smith; Unidentified Mimms and Nathaniel Quarterman with prejudice pursuant to 28 USC 1915A(b)(1). ORDERED that the Plaintiff may proceed with his deliberate indifference claims againstDr. Woody, R.D.A. Holliday, Nurse Williamson, Polunsky Unit Practice Manager K. Wallace and Food Services Officer Lemaster. Signed by Magistrate Judge Judith K. Guthrie on 8/12/09. (djh, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.