Dominguez v. Gulf Coast Marine & Associates, Inc.
| Maria Santos Lopez Dominguez |
| Gulf Coast Marine & Associates, Inc. |
| 9:2009cv00150 |
| September 14, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Lufkin Office |
| Anderson |
| T. John Ward |
| None |
| No cause code entered |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
95
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. Defendants' (Dkt No 196 in 9:08cv200) Consolidated Motion to Dismiss for Forum Non Conveniens is CONDITIONALLY GRANTED. Dismissal of each of the consolidated cases from the Court's docket becomes effective on ce defendants tender a written statement assenting to be bound by conditions as stated in this order, by 5/2/11. Failure of any defendant to do so by 5/2/11 will cause the Consolidated Motion for Dismissal for Forum Non Conveniens to be considered waived, and all seven cases will proceed to trial in this Court. Signed by Judge T. John Ward on 4/20/11. (leh, )
|
|
Filing
90
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER granting in part and denying in part defendants' 71 , 72 , 73 , and 81 Motions to Dismiss for reasons as stated in the order. Glen Carter's motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction (Dkt No. 73 at 4-6) is GRANTED. Glen Carter is ordered dismissed from the case. Signed by Judge T. John Ward on 11/16/10. (leh, )
|
|
Filing
66
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Granting in part and Denying in part defts 24 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. It is ORDERED that all claims in the Amended Complaint based upon maritime law of the U.S. are dismissed without pr ejudice and all claims in the Amended Complaint based on TX law are dismissed with prejudice. Pltfs are granted leave to file a Second Amended Complaint by 10/8/10, with defts response due 10/20/10. It is further ORDERED that defts are to file thei r opening brief on the issue of whether to dismiss the consolidated cases for forum non conveniens no later than 30 days after the Courts ruling on the defts anticipated motion to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint. As per the Courts order 63 , a ll consolidated briefing on the issue of forum non conveniens is to be filed in Dominguez vs. Gulf Coast Marine and Associates Inc. et al, case 9:08cv200. A Motion Hearing on the forum non conveniens issue is set for 3/10/2011 at 10:00 am in Ctrm 106 (Marshall) before Judge T. John Ward. Signed by Judge T. John Ward on 9/20/10.(leh, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Dominguez v. Gulf Coast Marine & Associates, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Maria Santos Lopez Dominguez | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Gulf Coast Marine & Associates, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
