Hawthorne v. Espino et al
| Barron L Hawthorne |
| Leanna C Combs, Philip K Whingham, Valentino Espino, Jonathan D Reynolds, Aaron P Riley, Joshua A Clark, Jr., Edward B Sells and Charlotte T Mattox |
| 9:2012cv00070 |
| May 14, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Lufkin Office |
| Angelina |
| Ron Clark |
| Judith K. Guthrie |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
43
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. Defendants' 26 Motion to Stay is hereby DENIED as MOOT. It is further ORDERED that Defendants' 29 Motion for Extension of Time to File Motion for Summary Judgment is hereby GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Deny Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 34 , construed as his Opposition to the Motion for Summary Judgment, is hereby GRANTED. It is finally ORDERED that Defendants' 30 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Judith K. Guthrie on 8/8/13. (ljw, )
|
|
Filing
10
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL. Plaintiff may proceed with his excessive use of force claim against Defendants Espino and Reynolds. The Plaintiff's remaining civil rights claims against Defendants Riley, Clark, Combs, Whingham, Sells and Mattox are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Judith K. Guthrie on 8/27/12. (ljw, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
