Randolph v. Pinecrest Retirement Communities
Plaintiff: Arlice J Randolph
Defendant: Pinecrest Retirement Communities
Case Number: 9:2015cv00039
Filed: March 17, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Office: Lufkin Office
County: Angelina
Presiding Judge: Zack Hawthorn
Presiding Judge: Michael H. Schneider
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 3, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTIONS AND ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AN D RECOMMENDATION. The Defendant's objections 17 are OVERRULED; the magistrate judge's report and recommendation 14 is ADOPTED; and Defendant's Motion to Dismiss 8 is DENIED. Signed by Judge Michael H. Schneider on 11/3/15. (ljw, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Randolph v. Pinecrest Retirement Communities
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Arlice J Randolph
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pinecrest Retirement Communities
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?