White v. Colorado City, TX - City et al
Craig Nelson Baldwin White |
Colorado City, TX - City, Louis Aguilar, Bowers and Colorado City Police Department |
1:2015cv00083 |
April 22, 2015 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Abilene Office |
Mitchell |
Jorge A Solis |
Other Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 22 Order Accepting Findings and Recommendations, 19 Findings and Recommendations on Granting re: 9 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, filed by Colorado City, TX - City, Colorado City Police Department, Bowers, Louis Agu ilar., denying Plaintiff's 15 MOTION for Hearing filed by Craig Nelson Baldwin White, 21 MOTION filed by Craig Nelson Baldwin White, 9 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by FNU Barrows, Colorado City, TX - City, Colorado City Police Department, Louis Aguilar. (Ordered by Chief Judge Jorge A Solis on 1/27/2016) (jgf) |
Filing 17 Order Accepting Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. The Court ACCEPTS the Report and Recommendation 13 and DENIES the Motion to Remand 8 and other requests made in that motion. Pursuant to Electronic Standing Order of Reference 12 , this action, including all pending motions, remain referred to the Magistrate Judge for case management. (Ordered by Chief Judge Jorge A Solis on 8/17/2015) (mmg) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.