Morris v. Melendrez et al
| Todrick Morris |
| Augustine Melendrez, Anastasio P Madrid, Dustin Anderson, Antonius Flanagan and Tammy Williams |
| 2:2015cv00128 |
| April 16, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Amarillo Office |
| Potter |
| Clinton E Averitte |
| Mary Lou Robinson |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
39
ORDER OF DISMISSAL re: 37 Report and Recommendation -- This Court, therefore, does hereby ADOPT the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge in this case. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment on the ground of qualified immunity be GRANTED. Further, it is ORDERED that the plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment be DENIED. Pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, sections 1915A and 1915(e)(2), as well as Title 42, United Stat es Code, section 1997e(c), it is ORDERED that the Civil Rights Claims filed pursuant to Title 42, United States Code, Section 1983, by plaintiff TODRICK MORRIS against defendants MELENDREZ, MADRID, ANDERSON and FLANAGAN be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE ON THE GROUND OF QUALIFIED IMMUNITY, DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM, and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE AS FRIVOLOUS as to his property deprivation claim. (Ordered by Senior Judge Mary Lou Robinson on 3/23/2017) (awc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
