Travelhost Inc v. Modglin et al
Travelhost Inc |
Trent Modglin and The Real Chicago Publishing LLC |
3:2011cv00456 |
March 4, 2011 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Dallas Office |
Dallas |
A. Joe Fish |
Jeff Kaplan |
Other Contract |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 85 Memorandum Opinion and Order granting 78 Motion for Reconsideration. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 6/6/2012) (ykp) |
Filing 77 Memorandum Opinion and Order denying 26 Motion for Preliminary Injunction and denying as moot 46 Motion to Strike. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 2/29/2012) (ctf) |
Filing 73 Memorandum Opinion and Order: Travelhost's 30 Motion to strike Modglin's counterclaim is DENIED; Travelhost's 31 Motion to dismiss Modglin's counterclaim is GRANTED; Travelhost's 52 Motion to strike Modglin's and RCP's response to its motion for default judgment is GRANTED; and Travelhost's 49 Motion for default judgment on monetary damages against RCP is GRANTED. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 2/27/2012) (ctf) Modified 2/27/2012 to insert correct link to Document 52 (motion to strike) (gmg). |
Filing 4 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Within ten days of this date, the plaintiff shall file and serve an amended complaint alleging the citizenship of Modglin as well as the names and citizenship of all members of the defendant Real Chicago Publishing. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 3/9/2011) (skt) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.