Stoneeagle Services Inc v. Gillman et al
Stoneeagle Services Inc |
David Gillman and Talon Transaction Technologies Inc |
3:2011cv02408 |
September 16, 2011 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Dallas Office |
Dallas |
Jorge A Solis |
Patent |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1338 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 388 Memorandum Opinion and Order granting 342 Motion for Protective Order filed by Talon Transaction Technologies Inc. (See order for specifics) (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L Horan on 11/13/2013) (mcrd) |
Filing 246 ORDER denying 42 Motion for Order to Show Cause; granting 50 Motion for Clarification of the Preliminary Injunction; denying 96 Motion to Partially Dismiss the Second Amended Answer and Counterclaims; Partially adopting 144 Findings and Recommendations and granting 146 Motion for Summary Judgment. Also granting 176 Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Objections; granting 190 Motion to Strike; denying 190 Motion for Leave to File. Plaintiff to provide a bond in the amount of $100,000.00 for clarified preliminary injunction. Court GRANTS Motion to Dismiss 8 Original Complaint in case no 3:12-cv-4397. (Ordered by Judge Jorge A Solis on 2/19/2013) (chmb) |
Filing 173 ORDER: Objections to Magistrate's Findings & Recommendations overruled and Findings and Recommendations accepted. Accordingly the Court denies 96 the Motion to Dismiss. (Ordered by Judge Jorge A Solis on 8/22/2012) (chmb) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.