Deutsche Bank National Trust v. Holmes

Defendant: Julius Holmes
Plaintiff: Deutsche Bank National Trust
Case Number: 3:2012cv00198
Filed: January 19, 2012
Court: Texas Northern District Court
Office: Dallas Office
County: Dallas
Presiding Judge: Reed C O'Connor
Referring Judge: Paul D Stickney
Nature of Suit: Rent, Lease, and Ejectment
Cause of Action: 28:1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
May 10, 2012 8 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER Accepting 7 Findings and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and Remanding case to County Count of Law Number 4 of Dallas County. (Ordered by Judge Reed C O'Connor on 5/10/2012) (axm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Deutsche Bank National Trust v. Holmes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Julius Holmes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Deutsche Bank National Trust
Represented By: Jack O'Boyle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.