MM United Enterprise, Inc. v. AGCS Marine Insurance Company

Plaintiff: MM United Enterprise, Inc.
Defendant: AGCS Marine Insurance Company
Case Number: 3:2012cv03744
Filed: September 14, 2012
Court: Texas Northern District Court
Office: Dallas Office
County: Dallas
Presiding Judge: Sam A Lindsay
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28:1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
January 7, 2014 50 Opinion or Order of the Court Memorandum Opinion and Order: The court denies 37 Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment; overrules 42 Plaintiffs objections to Defendants summary judgment evidence; and denies as moot 43 Defendants Motion for Leave to File Separate Response. (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 1/7/2014) (cea)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MM United Enterprise, Inc. v. AGCS Marine Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MM United Enterprise, Inc.
Represented By: John J Hopkins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AGCS Marine Insurance Company
Represented By: Christopher W Martin
Represented By: Patrick M Kemp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.