Ruiz v. Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID

Justia Dockets & Filings Fifth Circuit Texas Northern District Ruiz v. Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID

Ruiz v. Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID

Petitioner:	Wesley Lynn Ruiz
Respondent:	William Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
Case Number:	3:2012cv05112
Filed:	January 17, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Office:	Dallas Office
County:	Anderson
Presiding Judge:	David C Godbey
Nature of Suit:	Death Penalty
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 27, 2023	Filing 52 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 50 RULE 60(b) MOTION ANDTRANSFERRING PONTENTIALLY SUCCESSIVE PETITION: The clerk is directed to transfer the matter to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. Ruiz is DENIED a Certificate of Appealability on all his claims herein and the denialof his Rule 60(b) motion. Ruiz is DENIED a stay of execution. (Fifth Circuit notified via copy of the Notice of Electronic Filing.) (Fifth Circuit notified via copy of the Notice of Electronic Filing.) (Ordered by Chief District Judge David C Godbey on 1/27/2023) (frw)
December 14, 2018	Filing 36 Memorandum Opinion and Order: The Court denies Ruiz's amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The Court denies Ruiz a certificate of appealability because he has failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. If Ruiz files a notice of appeal, he may proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. (Ordered by Judge David C Godbey on 12/14/2018) (rekc)

Date Filed

Document Text

January 27, 2023

Filing 52 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 50 RULE 60(b) MOTION ANDTRANSFERRING PONTENTIALLY SUCCESSIVE PETITION: The clerk is directed to transfer the matter to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. Ruiz is DENIED a Certificate of Appealability on all his claims herein and the denialof his Rule 60(b) motion. Ruiz is DENIED a stay of execution. (Fifth Circuit notified via copy of the Notice of Electronic Filing.) (Fifth Circuit notified via copy of the Notice of Electronic Filing.) (Ordered by Chief District Judge David C Godbey on 1/27/2023) (frw)

December 14, 2018

Filing 36 Memorandum Opinion and Order: The Court denies Ruiz's amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The Court denies Ruiz a certificate of appealability because he has failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. If Ruiz files a notice of appeal, he may proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. (Ordered by Judge David C Godbey on 12/14/2018) (rekc)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ruiz v. Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Wesley Lynn Ruiz
Represented By:	Don Vernay
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: William Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
Represented By:	Tomee Morgan Heining
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?