Alarcon-Rodriguez v. Con-Way Truckload Inc et al

Plaintiff: Omar Alarcon-Rodriguez
Defendant: Con-Way Truckload Inc and Nannie Faulkner
Case Number: 3:2013cv00819
Filed: February 20, 2013
Court: Texas Northern District Court
Office: Dallas Office
County: Dallas
Presiding Judge: Reed C O'Connor
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Alarcon-Rodriguez v. Con-Way Truckload Inc et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Omar Alarcon-Rodriguez
Represented By: Lucas Lafitte
Represented By: Sandra Lynn Sprott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Con-Way Truckload Inc
Represented By: Michael Keith Justus
Represented By: D Randall Montgomery
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nannie Faulkner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.