Borrego v. Colvin

Borrego v. Colvin

Plaintiff:	Leocadio Medina Borrego
Defendant:	Carolyn W Colvin
Case Number:	3:2013cv00939
Filed:	March 2, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Office:	Dallas Office
County:	Dallas
Presiding Judge:	David C Godbey
Presiding Judge:	Paul D Stickney
Nature of Suit:	Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
October 28, 2013	Filing 23 ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE re: 22 Findings and Recommendations on Motion re: 21 Motion for Attorney Fees filed by Leocadio Medina Borrego. IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECRE ED that Plaintiff shall be awarded a total sum of $2,640.16 in attorney's fees. Payment of this award shall be made to Plaintiff, in care of Patrick Wright, and mailed to the Law Office of Patrick Wright, 10888 Shady Trail, Dallas, Texas 75220. (Ordered by Judge David C Godbey on 10/28/2013) (cea)
July 29, 2013	Filing 19 ORDER ACCEPTING 18 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE re: 1 Complaint filed by Leocadio Medina Borrego. Accordingly, Defendant Carolyn W. Colvin's (the "Commissioner") Motion to Reverse and Remand 17 is GRANTED and the Commissioner's decision is REVERSED and REMANDED for further administrative proceedings pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). (Ordered by Judge David C Godbey on 7/29/2013) (cea)

Date Filed

Document Text

October 28, 2013

Filing 23 ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE re: 22 Findings and Recommendations on Motion re: 21 Motion for Attorney Fees filed by Leocadio Medina Borrego. IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECRE ED that Plaintiff shall be awarded a total sum of $2,640.16 in attorney's fees. Payment of this award shall be made to Plaintiff, in care of Patrick Wright, and mailed to the Law Office of Patrick Wright, 10888 Shady Trail, Dallas, Texas 75220. (Ordered by Judge David C Godbey on 10/28/2013) (cea)

July 29, 2013

Filing 19 ORDER ACCEPTING 18 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE re: 1 Complaint filed by Leocadio Medina Borrego. Accordingly, Defendant Carolyn W. Colvin's (the "Commissioner") Motion to Reverse and Remand 17 is GRANTED and the Commissioner's decision is REVERSED and REMANDED for further administrative proceedings pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). (Ordered by Judge David C Godbey on 7/29/2013) (cea)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Borrego v. Colvin
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W Colvin
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Leocadio Medina Borrego
Represented By:	Patrick Wright
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?