Lombardi v. Bank of America NA et al
Plaintiff: Jean Lombardi
Defendant: Bank of America NA and The Bank of New York Mellon
Case Number: 3:2013cv01464
Filed: April 15, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Office: Dallas Office
County: Dallas
Presiding Judge: Reed C O'Connor
Presiding Judge: Irma Carrillo Ramirez
Nature of Suit: Real Property: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 26, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 188 ORDER granting 147 Motion for Summary Judgment and finding as moot 174 Findings and Recommendations on Case. Accordingly, Plaintiff is ORDERED to pay Intervenor rental damages of $41,190. (Ordered by Judge Reed C O'Connor on 9/26/2016) (epm)
November 23, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 152 ORDER ACCEPTING 142 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Based on the foregoing analysis, the Court finds that the Magistrate Judge's FCR in this case should be and is hereby ACCEPTED, Defendants 9; Second Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 123 ) is GRANTED, and the Plaintiff's remaining claim for violation of § 51.002(d) and her requested declaration that Defendants have "unclean hands" are DISMISSED with prejudice. (Ordered by Judge Reed C O'Connor on 11/23/2015) (bdb)
May 18, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 133 ORDER ACCEPTING 131 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Intervenor's 82 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, filed 10/9/2014, is hereby DENIED as moot. (Ordered by Judge Reed C O'Connor on 5/18/2015) (tln)
March 18, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 120 ORDER ACCEPTING 111 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 50 ) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Summary judgment is GRANTED on Plaintiff's claims for bre ach of contract and for violations of §§ 392.301(a)(8), 392.101, and § 392.303(a)(2) of the Texas Debt Collection Practices Act. Summary judgment is also GRANTED as to her request for a declaration that Defendants breached the deed of trust. At this time, summary judgment is DENIED as to Plaintiff's request for a declaration that Defendants have "unclean hands." Defendants are GRANTED leave to file a second motion for summary judgment regarding Plaintiff's Section 51.002(d) claim and Plaintiff's requested declaration that Defendants have "unclean hands" no later than 4/8/2015. (Ordered by Judge Reed C O'Connor on 3/18/2015) (ctf)
September 26, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 81 ORDER ACCEPTING 72 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE on Motion re: 32 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by EMI & WICK, LLC. EMI's Motion for Summary Judgment, filed 9/30/2013 (ECF No. 32 ), is DENIED in pa rt and GRANTED in part. EMI's motion for summary judgment on Plaintiff's claims is DENIED without prejudice to filing a second motion that specifically addresses Plaintiff's remaining claims, its motion for summary judgment on its trespass-to-try-title counterclaim is GRANTED, and its motion to expunge the notice of lis pendens is DENIED. (Ordered by Judge Reed C O'Connor on 9/26/2014) (cea)
March 13, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 45 ORDER ACCEPTING 43 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Accordingly, Defendant Bank of America, N.A. and The Bank of New York Mellon's 17 Motion to Dismiss, is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Plaintiff&# 039;s claims against Defendants for negligence, negligent misrepresentation, common law fraud, suit to quiet title, trespass to try title, unjust enrichment, and violations of the DTPA, RESPA, and §§ 392.304(a)(8),(19) of the TDCPA are DI SMISSED with prejudice. Her wrongful foreclosure claim, her breach of contract claim, and her TDCPA claims under §§ 392.301(a)(8) and 392.001 for failure to pay the requisite bond and § 392.303(a)(2) for charging unauthorized fees are allowed to proceed. Additionally, this case is referred to Magistrate Judge Ramirez for pretrial management. (Ordered by Judge Reed C O'Connor on 3/13/2014) (twd)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lombardi v. Bank of America NA et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jean Lombardi
Represented By: Kristen Nicole Blanchard
Represented By: Dolores G Gagnon
Represented By: Sarah June Lopano
Represented By: Jack B Peacock, Jr
Represented By: David M Vereeke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bank of America NA
Represented By: Tatiana Alexander
Represented By: Nathan T Anderson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Bank of New York Mellon
Represented By: Tatiana Alexander
Represented By: Nathan T Anderson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?