BlackBerry Limited v. Cypress Semiconductor Corporation
Plaintiff: BlackBerry Limited
Defendant: Cypress Semiconductor Corporation
Case Number: 3:2013cv04431
Filed: November 4, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Office: Dallas Office
County: Dallas
Presiding Judge: David C Godbey
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BlackBerry Limited v. Cypress Semiconductor Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: BlackBerry Limited
Represented By: Susan Baker Manning
Represented By: Gary Lincenberg
Represented By: Geoff M Howard
Represented By: Monica A Hernandez
Represented By: E Leon Carter
Represented By: Robert C Bertin
Represented By: John A Polito
Represented By: Thomas V Reichert
Represented By: Sheria Dranise Smith
Represented By: Richard de Bodo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cypress Semiconductor Corporation
Represented By: S Wallace Dunwoody, IV
Represented By: Michael C Wilson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?