Pinedo v. City of Dallas et al
Gerardo Pinedo, Sr. |
City of Dallas, Jamal Robinson and Mark Meltabarger |
3:2014cv00958 |
March 17, 2014 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Dallas Office |
Dallas |
Sidney A Fitzwater |
Other Personal Injury |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 92 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 77 Motion for Summary Judgment. Pinedo's action against Officer Robinson is dismissed based on qualified immunity. The court is today entering a final Rule 54(b) judgment in Officer Robinson's favor. Pinedo's claims against Officer Meltabarger are dismissed except for his claim for excessive force. (Ordered by Judge Sidney A Fitzwater on 1/13/2016) (ran) |
Filing 87 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 60 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by The City of Dallas, Texas. (Ordered by Judge Sidney A Fitzwater on 8/25/2015) (Judge Sidney A Fitzwater) |
Filing 68 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 67 MOTION for Leave to File Surreply filed by Gerardo Pinedo, Sr. (Ordered by Judge Sidney A Fitzwater on 4/8/2015) (Judge Sidney A Fitzwater) |
Filing 50 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 24 Motion to Dismiss filed by The City of Dallas, Texas, and granting 47 Motion to Dismiss filed by The City of Dallas, Texas, and granting plaintiff leave to replead except as to his state-law claims against the City. (Ordered by Judge Sidney A Fitzwater on 1/15/2015) (Judge Sidney A Fitzwater) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.