Garwell Limited Partnership v. Great American Insurance Company of New York

Defendant: Great American Insurance Company of New York
Plaintiff: Garwell Limited Partnership
Case Number: 3:2014cv01107
Filed: March 28, 2014
Court: Texas Northern District Court
Office: Dallas Office
County: Dallas
Presiding Judge: Jane J Boyle
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28:1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
October 22, 2014 33 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM ORDER AND OPINION denying 9 Motion to Remand. (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 10/22/2014) (twd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Garwell Limited Partnership v. Great American Insurance Company of New York
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Great American Insurance Company of New York
Represented By: J Chad Gauntt
Represented By: A Scott Kidd
Represented By: Karl W Koen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Garwell Limited Partnership
Represented By: Bruce Nowlin Patton
Represented By: Jeffrey Bruce Resnick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.