Osborne v. Thomas
| Jamar Osborne |
| Porsha R Thomas and City of Dallas, Texas |
| 3:2014cv03432 |
| September 23, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Dallas Office |
| Anderson |
| Ed Kinkeade |
| Paul D Stickney |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
70
Order Accepting 68 Findings and Recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge: Plaintiff Osbourne's 62 Motion to Amend Final Judgment, and Plaintiff Osbourne's 63 Verified Motion for New Trial, are DENIED. Plaintiff's 69 Objections are OVERRULED. (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 4/11/2016) (twd)
|
|
Filing
60
ORDER: After making the review required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), the Court finds that the Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are adopted as the findings and conclusions of the Court. Defendant C ity of Dallas' Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Claims Alleged Against it, and Brief in Support (Doc. No. 33 ), and Defendant Porsha R. Thomas' Motion for Summary Judgment on Qualified Immunity and Judicial Immunity (Doc. No. 35 ) are hereby GRANTED. Plaintiff's claims are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice. All other pending motions are hereby DENIED as moot. (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 12/11/2015) (bdb)
|
|
Filing
16
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. In this civil rights action challenging the City of Dallas's red light camera enforcement program, Plaintiff Jamar Osborne ("Osborne") has filed a motion to strike Defendant Porsha R. Thomas's (&q uot;Thomas") affirmative defense of judicial immunity or, in the alternative, qualified immunity. Plaintiff Jamar Osborne's Rule 12(f) motion to strike Defendant Porsha Thomas's immunity defenses (Doc. 12) is DENIED. (see order) (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Paul D Stickney on 5/6/2015) (mcrd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
