HSBC Bank USA NA v. Crum
| HSBC Bank USA NA |
| Kenneth E Crum |
| Kenneth E Crum |
| HSBC Bank USA NA |
| 3:2014cv03522 |
| September 29, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Dallas Office |
| Dallas |
| Jane J Boyle |
| All Other Real Property |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
72
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The Court GRANTS Plaintiff's 65 Motion for Award of Attorney's Fees in the amount of $12,867.00, but DENIES Plaintiff's Motion with respect to the request for attorney's fees for post-judgment motions or for an appeal. It is further ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that said award shall not be a money judgment but only a further obligation on Defendant's Texas Home Equity Note and his Texas Home Equity Security Instrument. (Ordered by Judge Jane J. Boyle on 5/31/2017) (ran)
|
|
Filing
64
Memorandum Opinion and Order granting 38 MOTION for Summary Judgment. (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 12/2/2016) (ykp)
|
|
Filing
58
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 38 Motion for Summary Judgment without prejudice, pending additional briefing by the parties. Because of the Court's order for additional briefing, the present trial date of February 29, 2016 is VACATED. A new trial date will be set after the Court resolves the summary judgment issues. (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 2/24/2016) (Judge Jane J Boyle) Modified docket text and document type on 2/24/2016 (ran).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
