Sprint Solutions Inc et al v. Taylor et al
| Sprint Solutions Inc and Sprint Communications Company LP |
| Joseph Taylor, III, Julie M Roberts, Bernard McGhee, Tony E Mims and LaToya S Taylor |
| 3:2014cv04124 |
| November 19, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Dallas Office |
| Dallas |
| Barbara M.G. Lynn |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 44 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
63
ORDER ACCEPTING 62 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Plaintiffs' 43 Motion for Default Final Judgment and Permanent Injunction and Awarding Damages Against Defendants Joseph Taylor III, Julie M. Roberts, Tony E. Mims, and Bernard McGhee (D.E. 43 ) is GRANTED in part. (Ordered by Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 2/4/2016) (ran) (Main Document 63 replaced on 2/4/2016) (ran).
|
|
Filing
35
Order Accepting 33 Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. It is Ordered that 17 Defendant Bernard McGhee's answer is stricken from the record as a sanction under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(f) for McGhee� 39;s failure to participate in a scheduling conference, appear at a status conference, and respond to a show cause order, without justification or excuse. Plaintiffs may move for clerk's entry of default and a default judgment against McGhee, as appropriate. (Ordered by Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 7/6/2015) (jrr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
