Celanese Corporation v. Clariant Corporation et al
| Celanese Corporation |
| Clariant Corporation and Clariant AG |
| 3:2014cv04165 |
| November 21, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Dallas Office |
| Dallas |
| Barbara M.G. Lynn |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
105
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 93 Third Motion to Compel and for Sanctions. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L Horan on 7/28/2016) (ran) (Main Document 105 replaced on 7/28/2016) (ran).
|
|
Filing
76
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The Court DENIES Clariant's Motion to Quash (No. 3:14-cv-4165-M, Dkt. No. 59 ) and HDI's Motion to Quash (No. 3:16-mc-15-M-BN, Dkt. No. 1). The Court ORDERS that HDI must comply with the Subpoena as modified t o the extent and in the manner described above. The Court further ORDERS counsel for Celanese and counsel for HDI to confer and attempt in good faith to reach an agreement on the deadline for HDI to complete its compliance with the Subpoena as ordere d by the Court. Celanese and HDI must file a joint status report by 3/25/2016 to inform the Court of the agreed deadline or, if agreement cannot be reached, the competing proposed deadlines for the Court's consideration and determination. Finally, the Court determines that Clariant, HDI, and Celanese will each bear its own costs in connection with Clariant's Motion to Quash and HDIs Motion to Quash. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L Horan on 3/18/2016) (ran)
|
|
Filing
74
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration [Docket Entry # 27 ] and Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint [Docket Entry # 31 ] are DENIED. (Ordered by Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 3/7/2016) (sss)
|
|
Filing
57
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The Court DENIES Clariant's Motion to Compel (Dkt. No. 40 ) without prejudice to Clariant's renewing its request to compel production of these documents on an appropriate showing after pursuing the informatio n that it seeks by other, appropriate means, including as discussed above. The Court further hereby issues a protective order under which Celanese need not produce these 12 withheld documents in response to Clariant's Request for Production No. 25 absent further order of the Court. And, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(a)(5), the Court determines that each party will bear its own costs in connection with Clariant's Motion to Compel. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L Horan on 12/21/2015) (bdb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
