Gore v. Stephens Director TDCJ-CID
Terrence M Gore |
Tene Callahan |
3:2015cv00272 |
January 28, 2015 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Dallas Office |
Dallas |
Ed Kinkeade |
Irma Carrillo Ramirez |
Prisoner Pet/Habeas Corpus: General |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 40 ORDER: It is ordered that Petitioner's objections to the recommendation that his in-forma-pauperis motion on appeal be denied and certified as not taken in good faith (doc. 38), are Denied/Overruled. Furthermore, it is ordered that Petition er's objections to the 8/27/2015 findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the magistrate judge (doc. 37) are sustained, such that Petitioner's motions to extend time to file a notice of appeal under Federal Rule of Appellate Proced ure 4(a)(5) (docs 28 and 29) are granted, and the notice of appeal filed on 8/13/2015 is deemed timely filed within the extended time allowed under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 4(a)(5). (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 9/10/2015) (jrr) |
Filing 35 ORDER OF THE COURT ON RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING IFP AND CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY. The petitioner is DENIED in forma pauperis status on appeal re: 31 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Terrence M Gore. The petitioner is DENIED a Certificate of Appealability re: 32 Motion for Certificate of Appealability and 33 Amended Motion for Certificate of Appealability filed by Terrence M Gore. (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 8/26/2015) (ndt) |
Filing 34 RECOMMENDATION REGARDING IN FORMA PAUPERIS and CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY re: 31 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Terrence M Gore, 32 Motion for Certificate of Appealability filed by Terrence M Gore, 33 Amended Motion for Certificate of Appealability filed by Terrence M Gore. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 8/25/2015) (ndt) |
Filing 25 Order Accepting Findings and Recommendations and Denying Certificate of Appealability re: 22 Findings and Recommendations on Case re: 9 Motion to Stay filed by Terrence M Gore, 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Terrence M Go re. If the petitioner files a notice of appeal, he must pay the $505.00 appellate filing fee or submit a motion to proceed in forma pauperis and a properly signed certificate of inmate trust account. (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 7/9/2015) (ndt) |
Filing 5 ORDER ACCEPTING 3 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 3/4/2015) (skt) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Gore v. Stephens Director TDCJ-CID | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Terrence M Gore | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Tene Callahan | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.