Davidson v. AT&T Inc et al
| Thomas Landell Davidson |
| AT&T Inc, City of Dallas Texas and Officer Jarvis (Badge #10097) |
| 3:2017cv00006 |
| January 3, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Dallas Office |
| Dallas |
| Sidney A Fitzwater |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
120
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 97 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Alan Jarvis. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sidney A Fitzwater on 2/7/2019) (Senior Judge Sidney A Fitzwater)
|
|
Filing
90
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 74 Motion to Dismiss filed by AT&T Inc. (Ordered by Judge Sidney A Fitzwater on 8/27/2018) (Judge Sidney A Fitzwater)
|
|
Filing
68
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part, denying in part 63 Joint MOTION to Strike 60 Designation of Experts filed by AT&T Mobility LLC, Alan Jarvis, City of Dallas Texas. (Ordered by Judge Sidney A Fitzwater on 4/3/2018) (Judge Sidney A Fitzwater)
|
|
Filing
67
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 37 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by AT&T Mobility LLC; granting 39 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by City of Dallas Texas; denying 40 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Officer Jarvis (Badge #10097); and granting plaintiff leave to replead. (Ordered by Judge Sidney A Fitzwater on 3/21/2018) (Judge Sidney A Fitzwater)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
