BNSF Railway Company v. United Transportation Union

Plaintiff: BNSF Railway Company
Defendant: United Transportation Union
Case Number: 4:2010cv00379
Filed: May 28, 2010
Court: Texas Northern District Court
Office: Fort Worth Office
County: Tarrant
Presiding Judge: John McBryde
Nature of Suit: Railway Labor Act
Cause of Action: 45:151
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
December 28, 2010 22 Opinion or Order of the Court Memorandum Opinion and Order: The court DECLARES that the dispute involved in this action is a minor dispute subject to compulsory arbitration under section 3 of the RLA, and ORDERS that all relief sought by defendant through its counterclaim be, and is hereby, denied. [see Order for specifics] (Ordered by Judge John McBryde on 12/28/2010) (klm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BNSF Railway Company v. United Transportation Union
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: BNSF Railway Company
Represented By: David M Pryor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United Transportation Union
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.