Dow v. Colvin

Plaintiff: Issac J. Dow
Defendant: Carolyn W Colvin
Case Number: 4:2013cv00299
Filed: April 10, 2013
Court: Texas Northern District Court
Office: Fort Worth Office
County: Tarrant
Presiding Judge: John McBryde
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
May 10, 2013 9 Opinion or Order of the Court Order Accepting 8 Findings and Recommendations re Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. The court further ORDERS that plaintiff by 4:00 p.m. on 5/17/2013, pay to the Clerk of the court the full filing fee of $350.00. (Ordered by Judge John McBryde on 5/10/2013) (dnw)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dow v. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Issac J. Dow
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.