Digital Recognition Network, Inc. v. Accurate Adjustments, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Digital Recognition Network, Inc.
Defendant: Accurate Adjustments, Inc., Coastline Recovery Services, Inc., After Hours Auto Recovery, Inc. and Solid Solutions 24/7, Inc.
Case Number: 4:2014cv00903
Filed: November 6, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Office: Fort Worth Office
County: Tarrant
Presiding Judge: John McBryde
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 8, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 119 Memorandum Opinion and Order... The court ORDERS that plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment be, and is hereby, granted in part; defendants' liability on plaintiff's breach of contract claim be, and is hereby, established; d efendants take nothing on their counterclaim against plaintiff, and such counterclaim be, and is hereby, dismissed. The court ORDERS that, except as granted herein, the motion for partial summary judgment be, and is hereby, denied. The court determines that there is no just reason for delay in, and hereby directs, entry of final judgment as to the dismissal of defendants' counterclaim. (Ordered by Judge John McBryde on 3/8/2016) (wxc)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Digital Recognition Network, Inc. v. Accurate Adjustments, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Digital Recognition Network, Inc.
Represented By: Douglas R Hudman
Represented By: Cole B Ramey
Represented By: W Alan Wright
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Accurate Adjustments, Inc.
Represented By: Kenneth C Riney
Represented By: Sara Siegall
Represented By: Peter M Spingola
Represented By: Gina Viccinelli
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Coastline Recovery Services, Inc.
Represented By: Kenneth C Riney
Represented By: Sara Siegall
Represented By: Peter M Spingola
Represented By: Gina Viccinelli
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: After Hours Auto Recovery, Inc.
Represented By: Kenneth C Riney
Represented By: Sara Siegall
Represented By: Peter M Spingola
Represented By: Gina Viccinelli
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Solid Solutions 24/7, Inc.
Represented By: Kenneth C Riney
Represented By: Sara Siegall
Represented By: Peter M Spingola
Represented By: Gina Viccinelli
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?